EU hardens stance on Israel as security cabinet approves Gaza City takeover plan

Israel’s security cabinet approved a plan to take control of Gaza City, a move expanding military operations in the shattered Palestinian territory that drew strong fresh criticism at home and abroad on Friday over its pursuit of the almost two-year-old war.

The European Union’s position on Israel’s actions in Gaza is increasingly critical, though not fully unified, as Israel’s security cabinet approved a plan to take control of Gaza City, escalating the nearly two-year-long war.

Germany, a key EU member, announced a halt to exports of military equipment to Israel that could be used in Gaza, prompting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to express disappointment in a call with Chancellor Friedrich Merz.

Berlin’s move is significant. For historic reasons, particularly its responsibility for the Holocaust, Germany has been a strong supporter of Israel since its founding in 1948.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen joined other European leaders, including Britain, in urging Israel to reconsider its military escalation, reflecting growing unease among EU nations.

Regional power Saudi Arabia, which has said it could not normalise ties with Israel without the establishment of a Palestinian state, condemned any move to occupy Gaza.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, told Reuters that some countries appeared to be putting pressure on Israel rather than on the militant group Hamas, whose deadly attack on Israel in 2023 ignited the war.

While some EU countries like Britain, France, and Canada have signalled openness to recognising a Palestinian state at the upcoming U.N. General Assembly, the EU’s response remains fragmented.

In Israel, families of hostages held by militants in Gaza, and opposition leaders blasted Netanyahu for a decision that they said would put hostages’ lives at risk.

Far-right allies in the prime minister’s coalition have been pushing for a total takeover of Gaza as part of his vow to eradicate Hamas militants, though the military has warned this could endanger the lives of remaining hostages held by militants.

Opposition leader Yair Lapid called the decision to send Israeli forces into Gaza City a disaster, saying it defied the advice of military and security officials.

He accused far-right ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich of dragging Netanyahu into a prolonged campaign that would result in the deaths of hostages and soldiers.

Netanyahu told Fox News Channel’s Bill Hemmer in an interview that aired on Thursday that the military intended to take control of all of Gaza. He said Israel did not want to keep the Gaza Strip, but to establish a “security perimeter” and to hand over the territory to Arab forces.

The announcement from the prime minister’s office early on Friday, following Thursday’s security cabinet meeting, said the military would take Gaza City, but did not say if Israeli forces would take all of the enclave.

Israel’s cabinet is expected to endorse the Gaza City plan.

Netanyahu spoke with Merz on Friday to express disappointment over Berlin’s suspension of weapons exports to Israel, the prime minister’s office said.

Netanyahu told the chancellor that Israel’s goal was to “free Gaza from Hamas” so a peaceful government could be established there, and that Israel does not intend to take it over, it said.

‘Heart of Gaza’

The military has said that it controls around 75% of Gaza. Amir Avivi, a retired Israeli brigadier general, estimated that if the military did take Gaza City, it would give Israel control of about 85% of the strip.

“Gaza City is the heart of Gaza. It’s really the centre of government. It has always been the strongest and even in the eyes of Hamas, the fall of Gaza City is pretty much the fall of Hamas,” said Avivi. “Taking over Gaza City is a game changer.”

Israeli media have said 900,000 people now live in Gaza City, including many who have been displaced by the military.

“Where should we go? Do we throw ourselves in the sea?,” said Maghzouza Saada, a displaced Palestinian from Gaza’s north.

Before the war, Hamas’ most powerful fighting units were believed to operate in northern Gaza, including Gaza City.

There are 50 hostages still held in Gaza, of whom Israeli officials believe 20 are alive. Most of those freed so far emerged as a result of diplomatic negotiations. Talks toward a ceasefire that could have seen more hostages released collapsed in July.

Israel had already come under mounting pressure at home and abroad over the war in Gaza, including over the humanitarian disaster in the enclave. In recent weeks, Britain, Canada and France said they could recognise a Palestinian state at the U.N. General Assembly next month.

Domestic pressure

Netanyahu has said there will be no end to the war until Hamas is disarmed. Opinion polls have shown that a majority of Israelis believe he should end the war immediately in a diplomatic agreement that would see the release of remaining hostages.

The Hostages Families Forum, which represents many families of captives in Gaza, said the pursuit of occupying Gaza means abandoning the hostages all while ignoring public support to immediately end the war in a deal that releases the hostages.

It said in a statement the security cabinet had chosen to “embark on another march of recklessness, on the backs of the hostages, the soldiers, and Israeli society as a whole”.

“I think it’s a death sentence to all the hostages that are still being held there. And it’s the wrong decision to do it at this time,” Danny Bukovsky, a hotelier in Tel Aviv, said of the announcement that Israeli forces would move into Gaza City.

A full occupation of Gaza would reverse a 2005 decision in which Israel withdrew thousands of Jewish settlers and its forces, while retaining control over its borders, airspace and utilities.

With Reuters, edited by g.g.

Caption: Internally displaced Palestinians waiting for aid trucks near a food distribution point in Zikim, northern Gaza Strip, on 08 August 2025. Humanitarian organizations have warned of an imminent food catastrophe for thousands of children, a crisis caused by severe food insecurity, a decline in health services, and ongoing restrictions on humanitarian aid and essential supplies. EPA/MOHAMMED SABER